One
of the fastest ways to make an enemy in the US today would be to indicate
support for one candidate or the other in the Presidential elections
scheduled for 8th November. Things are
so bad that quite a number of people are actually predicting
the elections would not be allowed to hold!
Hillary Clinton is trying to make
history as the first woman to hold the highest political office in the US (and
the entire planet). She narrowly lost to
incumbent President Obama 8 years ago, and served as his Secretary of State in
the first term before resigning to prepare for her campaign for the Presidency
this time around. A liberal to the core,
Hillary has a history of supporting policies that the common folks tend to
(rightly or wrongly) applaud. She
however gained tremendous respect and affection of people all over the world in
her handling the notorious affairs between her husband, then President Bill
Clinton and a White House intern, Monica Lewinsky in 1998. Ordinarily, it would
have been a great pleasure supporting such a candidate. The flip side of her candidacy is however
rooted in the fact that she is obviously an “Establishment” candidate. It is very clear that all the US Presidential
candidates from the two major political parties have been those pushed forward
by the globalist New World Order establishment.
Indeed, as we pointed out before, but for the 8 year-interregnum that
President Obama represents, the Presidency of the US in the last 32 years has
shifted to-and-fro been between two families - the Bush and the Clintons. That would probably extend another 8 years if
Hillary wins this November. After that
some Bush should be ready to take over. So much for democracy!
The implication of being an
establishment candidate is that the globalist agenda would be followed to the
hilt. America must continue to lose its
sovereignty and liberal moral-neutral values, unreasonable deferments to
Islamism and global terror, anti-semitism, etc must intensify. Other issues weighing strongly against
Hillary’s candidacy include issues with her health,
and the ruthlessness that has seen a steady stream of people who threaten to
expose her dirty linens, mysteriously ending up assassinated.. The stakes are truly unprecedented.
Mr Trump’s
strength is predicated on being the opposite of Hillary Clinton. First, very clearly, he is a candidate not
anticipated by the globalist establishment.
As a matter of fact, there was intense campaign by globalists all over
the world to ensure he did not emerge the candidate for his Party; but the
nerves he stirs up are too deep for a vast number of Americans to ignore. He won the Republican nomination and is doing
fairly well in the national polls as at the present time.
But again, just as Hillary Clinton is
desperate to please her masters back-stage, Trump also has to continually stoke
the rage in his anti-establishment right-wingers supporters. At a point, Trump declared he would restrict
all moslems
from entering the US. (He later back-pedalled
somewhat). It is evident that just like in Christianity (unfortunately), most
moslems are only so in name! It would
therefore be quite an extreme measure placing a blanket ban on all who go by
that label. Of course Islamist stealth
aggression is a tremendous problem for the US, and the current gloves-in-hand
treatment being used in handling it by the current US administration has
provoked an outrage that could make such an extreme suggestion by a major
presidential candidate quite welcome among a significant fraction of America’s
citizenry! Other factors standing
against Mr Trump, who would be the oldest president to be elected, (if he
wins), include history of aggressive business deal (possibly even with Russian
partners – conflicting personal and national interests), and a history of shameful
sleaze dealings with women, not too different from Bill Clinton’s. As the D-day
to elections approaches, Russia is demonstrating a near-desperation to see to
it that Trump wins – to the point of declaring
that nuclear exchange is inevitable in the event that Clinton wins! That sounded like Obama’s threatening the UK
in his desperation to prevent a Brexit.
In our opinion, the worst side of this
story for America is that the two polarized segments of the American society
have convinced themselves that the other party is bent on rigging the election,
and that whatever it takes, including violence, the other party must be stopped. Readers in Africa know exactly what the
rallying cry to “protect your votes” means!
It is the perfect recipe for calamity of monumental proportions. This is one of the reasons some informed
commentators are expressing doubts the election might be allowed to hold at all. Perhaps the incumbent President would
instigate some major trouble somewhere in the world – such as ongoing face-off
with Russia,
which would necessitate some emergency measures, (including postponement of the
elections) being clamped on the country.
Whatever be the case, it’s only a matter of weeks before the bubbles
burst. It is amazing that in this one of
the most definitive moments in the history of the planet, a vast majority of the
inhabitants have gone lethargic and are entirely occupied with the pursuit of
some personal parochial agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment