Friday, February 2, 2018

Hypergrace articles from vol 20 qtr 4 (draft)


Grace Visitation for OAU, Ile-Ife and Nigeria
Few would contest that the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife is a major spiritual hotspot in Nigeria. Over the decades, it has become a major theatre for strategic battles between the dark occult forces and the forces of the kingdom of Light contending for the soul of Nigeria. Little surprise then that the LORD would choose the campus to release in quick succession, two major salvos against the rampaging false teaching of the Once-Saved-Always-Saved (OSAS) movement.
First was the incisive and painstaking teaching by Pastor Ezekiel A. Odeyemi at the annual Dominant Army Conference of the Redeemed Christian Fellowship (RCF) on December 3rd 2017.  Pastor Odeyemi is the Assistant General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) in charge of Education and Training; and he directly oversees the Campus ministry of the RCCG, the RCF, currently established in more than 250 Institutions of higher learning in Nigeria.  Coming almost a decade after his last visit to the OAU Campus, Pastor Odeyemi seized the opportunity of the Dominant Army Conference to bring forth a thorough Biblical exposition on the issue of Grace. Beginning with an extensive clarification of the background and contexts of the various Pauline epistles, he addressed the theme of the Conference (Gospel Herald/Change Agents) and concluded that no one can really be an agent of reconciliation if their life was not changed first.  “You cannot make a difference if you are not different.  How you live your life matters to God, and to the people around you,” he declared.
      Then seven weeks later, came the General Overseer of the RCCG himself on his annual pastoral visit to the OAU.  Quite unexpectedly, Pastor Enoch Adeboye veered off the advertised theme, and declared he would be presenting perhaps his most important teaching in all the 30 years he had been visiting the University.  And yes, it was all on the issue of "Hypergrace" and Eternal Security. It was a hard-hitting bare-knuckles thrashing!
Pastor Adeboye warned that some visible Christian leaders might indeed be pressured into accommodating the “hypergrace” teaching simply as an opportunity to cover the many scandals, past and ongoing, they have been trying to keep away from the public view. With licentious grace making the waves, rather than become despicable liabilities, such scandals might as well become epaulettes to be proudly worn and touted as exemplifying "unimaginable depths of grace" which keep a man approved of God despite mountains of unconfessed and unrepented sins!
 Systematically, (and incredibly in the space of barely 45 minutes), Pastor Adeboye dealt with all the key points OSAS teachers use to lure and confuse people into their heresy; and utterly demolished them in the light of the word of God. 
To the glory of God, a great throng of young people previously swept away or in the process of being so swept by the false teaching stepped forward to renounce the teachings, repent their sins, and rededicate their lives to the Lord Jesus.
Listen on our website to the audios of the messages by Pastor Odeyemi (here), and Pastor Adeboye (here).  The videos are also posted on youtube here and here.

Leading OSAS purveyor, Jack Kelley, backtracks on the Sin question
Outspoken Once-Saved-Always-Saved (OSAS) preacher, Jack Kelley has released a new Bible Study, admitting the need for repentance and confession of sins unwittingly committed by a heaven-bound Christian. Furthermore, he now also insists that a “state of continual closeness” to God – otherwise known as obedience or holiness – is necessary if one would not fall prey to the devil. The devil? Yes, the devil is also no longer to be arrogantly ignored, but soberly guarded against as the Bible counsels in 1 Peter 5:8-9!
Hitherto, these have been major issues of controversy in the OSAS doctrine.  Evidently, IF anyone would embrace and abide with the prescriptions now being conceded by Jack Kelley, there would be no arguing the point that they could validly claim to be irreversibly eternally secure!  The whole point is not whether our salvation is eternally secured or not, but rather if there are any responsibilities expected of us to bring to pass what the Lord has graciously provided. Notice the “IF” in the following key statement from the Bible:
“Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall: “2 Peter 1:10 
Although in the new teaching, Jack Kelley very clearly assaults the basic axiom of the OSAS doctrine - the flat insistence that nothing one does or fails to do (deliberately or otherwise) has any implication on their eternal salvation [a.k.a. unconditional eternal security]; yet he still confounds this new position with a rehashing (possibly out of honest confusion) of a major paradigm in OSAS which, alluding to natural birth, insists that a Christian once born-again, cannot become “unborn” for any reason. That of course brings us back to the central tenet of the OSAS doctrine that a Christian cannot lose his salvation under any condition!
The fault with this “natural birth analogy” as we pointed out in our special write-up on OSAS, is that salvation at this point “in time” is not yet concluded.  It remains an ongoing business till we step out of time into “eternity”!  True, it has been paid for in full, but we are still required to work it out.  As we also pointed out in the same write-up, Kenneth Haggin Ministry refers to this process as "Sanctification" which it goes on to define “as a definite, yet progressive work of grace, commencing at the time of regeneration and continuing until the consummation of salvation at Christ’s return (Heb. 12:14; 1 Thess. 5:23; 2 Peter 3:18; 2 Cor. 3:18; Phil. 3:12–14; 1 Cor. 1:30).” In other words, we are “works-in-progress”, and our salvation is yet to be consummated.
This crucial point can be clearly illustrated with the betrothal of a woman to a man, just as Mary was betrothed to Joseph.  With the act of betrothal, the journey to marriage is to all intents and purposes, right on course; and the couple might now even be addressed as “husband” and “wife”.  However, until the nuptial knot is eventually tied and the marriage consummated, the process could still be aborted.  Joseph considered doing just that, until advised otherwise by an angel (Mathew 1:19-20)
The situation is beautifully illustrated by the cover image we used for our special write-up.  Taken from a cover to John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, it shows the path from earth to the celestial city already cleared for passage, and a figure (presumably the Lord Jesus Christ, who had traversed that same path) standing at the other end, beckoning to Pilgrim and urging him on, via the footprints left behind.  However there are two ferocious lions on either side of the path!  But then they are chained!  Pilgrim is required to trust the Lord urging him on, and boldly ignore the menacing lions, assured that if he walks in the Master’s footsteps clearly visible before him, he is firmly out of their reach!
In other words, the correct “natural birth analogy” Jack Kelley should have used would be that the Christian, as long as he is on this planet, is still like a baby in the womb.  Conception is already an irreversibly done deal; and all things equal, birth after the necessary gestation period is guaranteed – with the baby not needing to contribute anything to the process.  Nevertheless, it is not over until it is over.  Our archenemy is most conscious of this, and he desperately seeks for any conceivable means to abort the pregnancy.  Such as suggesting to the foetus it can do away with the umbilical cord without any grave repercussion!
The significant, cheering news is that Jack Kelley now teaches that even though the “Union” of a believer is unconditional and irrevocably secured at the point of new birth, it must still be continually serviced by “Fellowship.”  Describing fellowship as “a little more complicated (than Union)”, Kelley agrees it includes abhorrence and regular confession of sins, coupled with continued obedience to the commandments of God. 
As mentioned earlier, these are the very points of contention in OSAS where people are taught they have absolutely no further responsibility in “working out their salvation”; and that such acts of confession of sins and continued obedience to the instructions of the Lord actually amount to “Works” being added to “Grace”. 
Kelley was apparently led to these new revelations by his genuine concerns and honest evaluations that many OSAS-affirming believers are living “defeated lives” with droves getting “discouraged and even [no longer] praying and attending church.”  He therefore offers his new more Biblical position.  Hopefully, people who have been deceived into the OSAS error will recognize all these shifting grounds which the Jack Kelleys of this world are however reluctant to boldly admit. Please read our more detailed comment on Jack Kelley’s welcomed new stance on our blog.
As we repeatedly emphasized in our special write-up, if only OSAS preachers will stop undermining foundational bible teachings, such as need for repentance, there would be no need splitting hairs over their teaching which could be waved aside as merely an unhelpful but permissible juvenile perspective.  After all no one wishes to end up promoting the equally false impression at the other extreme: that it is okay to become obsessed with the possibilities of “falling from grace” or become drowned in “sin consciousness”!   Though one who is born of God does not sin, (as Pastor Enoch Adeboye explains, simply because sin is no longer in his DNA – 2 Cor. 5:17), there is still the possibility of him falling into it if he is careless and docilely yields himself for manipulation by every “sleight of men” (Eph. 4:14).  After all, though it is not in a sheep’s DNA to eat meat or dung, with sustained wrong company and counsel, coupled with some efforts, mince-meat and excreta may soon begin to taste like privileged high-class diet (like some humans now see GMOs and other tasty junk “foods!”). 
For such infractions when we foolishly or carelessly play into the hand of the devil, we can be assured that the all-wise and loving Father has already provided a way of escape – REPENTANCE (1 John 1:9).  And Restitution where necessary!  It is outrageous therefore, that it is this very way of escape that “new-school” OSAS teachers desperately seek to block when they declare as a taboo, any resort to repentance or confession of sin.
As they vainly try to convince us, attempting to confess sins that God, supposedly, had already forgiven (even prior to their commission) can only amount to unbelief and recourse to self-righteousness – the only sin that even the lascivious grace of OSAS heresy cannot handle! 
Now that a key OSAS teacher like Jack Kelley has begun to admit that a holy God cannot tolerate “unconfessed sins,” one wonders why any reasonable so-called Christian will still spurn a consciously holy lifestyle (with sorrowful confession of sins if or when they happen); and would rather opt for a life of separation from the Father and associated vulnerability to Devil’s wicked oppression.
The truth of the matter, of course, is that God is not a petty sadist insisting on things being done His own way, just to prove a point that He is the one in charge.  He requires that repentance and asking of forgiveness (Luke 17:4) should precede forgiveness and acquittal because, in His great wisdom, He has designed that the power to overcome sin should be unleashed by the very process of repentance!  We need to agree that what God calls sin is indeed sinful, wrong, and unhelpful; and understand that willfully going into sin is exactly tantamount to eating our own excreta or vomit!  Then sin loses every appeal and power over our lives. 
This indeed is the central tenet of the Christian faith.  As we believe in Jesus correctly and accept Him, we are empowered to become sons of God (John 1:12). The victory is in our believing (1 John 5:5). Anyone who repudiates this basic tenet will continue to endless wallow in sin, till he would conclude that living a life free of sin is simply impossible.  For such people, the Lord’s instruction to “go and sin no more” (John 8:11b) simply does not make any sense!
As Chris Onayinka and his ilk heretically interpret Mathew 1:21, Jesus came NOT to save people from their sins, but rather to excuse their sins which they may now continue to practice with impunity! (see references in our previous Write-up). On the contrary, as Pastor Odeyemi declared at the OAU on the basis of Rom 6:1-4, Grace actually enables us to live above sin, not to continue in it.
All this is why we must earnestly contend against these vociferous enchanters who teach the gullible they could continue with impunity in their sins, and that they are never to confess them or ask forgiveness of them.

Smooth-talking teachers who spend hours preaching, blogging, and facebooking on the “Neither do I condemn thee” portion of John 8:11 but woefully fail to mention the “go and sin no more” conclusion are dishonest and wicked agents of the devil, masquerading as teachers of the gospel. Spurred on by their fanciful thoughts that they are uncovering some never-before-seen deep truths of the Gospel, they tear and maul the Scriptures as they desperately push concepts designed to harden the conscience of people, eventually destroying their destiny and if possible, pushing them into hell-fire.  Their evil mouths indeed “must be stopped” (Titus 1:11, Jude 1:3-4).  (See also on our Blog the article: ON THE QUESTION OF SIN IN THE OSAS HERESY)

The Nature of Doctrinal (including OSAS) Errors
Unfortunately, doctrinal errors generally target the easy-going, those willing to uncritically trust smooth-talking icons who tease them with the rather exciting prospect of pushing at existing frontiers and status quo. Ironically, these are often people who are desirous to please God above anything else – including the acceptance of the larger society!  With the devil preying on the simple and vulnerable in this manner, he is shown vividly for who he is: the utterly disgusting ultimate-pervert!
Whether it is Jehovah Witnesses (with their claims that the Lord Jesus was indeed an upgrade version of the archangel Michael, and therefore a created being like the rest of us); or Mormons (who imply the same falsehood by averring that the Lord Jesus and Lucifer are brothers); or some of the many New Age groups, now spanning virtually the entire spectrum and flavours of the Christian faith, people caught in the web of doctrinal errors are generally amiable, peace-loving folks.
This same basic character (plus a good dose of arrogance!) is true even for the average OSAS adherent.  Even when they catch the glimpse of the tremendous havoc their teachings could cause in society, helping to further Satan’s agenda and kingdom, they still shrug it off and insist they must stick to the “revelation” they have received.  In other words, ostensibly, the driving motive is really a desire to honour God’s words above natural senses. That could indeed sound noble!
The reality however is that one or more of the basic lusts – of the eye, of the flesh, or the pride of life is usually at play, which Satan deftly uses to bait the hook.
Fundamentally, doctrinal error is all a question of right balance.  Most of the time, in efforts to quell one error, people drift into another – on the other side of the divide! Hence historically, the OSAS/Eternal Security doctrine, springing up from hyper-calvinism, was a response to doctrines on the other extreme, proclaiming a man eternally dammed on inadvertent infringement of even a jot in the law.
Let’s consider the original error, the promise of godhood to mankind.  Mother Eve believed this at her time. And so do multitudes of Mormons today, with their basic postulate: “As He once was, so are we.  As He is, so shall we be”.  Well, where really is the error in this primary inspiration for the evolution theory? After all the Lord Jesus Himself plainly cited the Scriptures in Psalm 82, which refers to God’s people as “gods” (Psa 82:6, John 10:34).   Moreover, the bottom-line of the Christian message is that we need to realize that Jesus has brought “many sons to glory” and “as He is, so are we in this world” (Heb. 2:10, 1 Jhn 4:17).
Doctrinal error is all about the right balance. The subtle error in this particular heresy is equating the only begotten Son of God with us adopted sons of God.  In truth, there is one Son that is pre-eminent among other sons.  Just as the Head is pre-eminent among the other members with which it forms just one body.  The normal Christian joyfully accepts this position and reverences the Big Brother.  The heretic, like Satan before, considers equality with the Son something to be grasped (Phil. 2:6, Isa. 14:12-14) and pushes his authority – not to claim his rightful position in God’s creation, but with the Lord Himself! 
Indeed this is the summary of the new age movement, where every “god” that erstwhile humans have supposedly become, now live in the world of their own creation, with little or no regard for the Laws and guidelines instituted by the Almighty.  The “Christianize” version of this heresy boasts that “new creation realities” are under no bloody law whatsoever!  And so the chaos continues.
It would appear as if the root of all evil and false doctrines these end-times is the hypergrace concept.  The other time on a social media group, war almost broke out as the hypergrace faction vehemently opposed a call that Nigerian Christians should repent and confess the national sins before expecting the Lord to hear their pleas for a re-structured New Nigeria or provide relief from the militia herdsmen!
The real culprit is the magic word “hypergrace”.  In truth, no word could be more unbiblical.  “Grace” is already in the superlative, and trying to hype it, is totally meaningless!  For instance, is it possible to promote “God” to a “super God?” Absolutely inconceivable and totally meaningless! There is only one God.  And He is already the best He could be. He has always been, and will ever so remain. That’s one of the attributes that uniquely belong to God: Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and today, and forever!
In like manner, Grace is already unfathomable.  Yes, we can have it continually multiplied unto us (2 Pet. 1:2), such that it becomes “great Grace” (Acts 4:33); nevertheless Grace is Grace, and cannot be subordinated to some new concept.  The dubious coinage “hypergrace” is not only meaningless, it indeed goes overboard into the negative.
Let’s consider a physical example. The coldest temperature conceivable (and it really is unattainable) is “zero” on the Kelvin scale. It is called “absolute temperature.” In this sense, it is already a superlative and cannot be “improved” on.  However, as with the “hypergrace” coinage, it is also possible to rant about temperature numbers lower than “zero”, (that is negative numbers) on the Kelvin scale.  But such “hypo-absolute temperature” would have no physical meaning, and rather than being calmer or colder than the absolute temperature, would indeed be as raging hot as hell!
It is indeed true that we cannot “out-sin” grace, as it enlarges to cover all sins.  Grace, not some “hypergrace”, enlarges to cover all sins conceivable. That’s an absolute!  The critical question, which the Apostle poignantly pointed out in Rom 6:1 is “Can we therefore CONTINUE in sin, knowing grace would abound anyway?”  (paraphrased).
And the answer is: how could anyone who has been so wonderfully lifted above sin go back into it?  How can one continue to wallow in sin just because there is grace? The only “grace” that answers for such insane deliberate wallowing in sin is “hypergrace”. Hypergrace is nothing more than the modern word for lasciviousness. It is a lure to develop a taste for sin, and defiantly wallow in it endlessly.
Godly balance can be obtained by diligent study of the scriptures with open mind (Jhn 7:17), coupled with a careful study of the history of that doctrine which seems to make sense only to the “enlightened “ folks in your little group that is totally cut off from reality!

Thursday, February 1, 2018

A significant shift in position by leading OSAS teacher, Jack Kelley


We have cited Jack Kelley before.  In our special publication examining OSAS doctrine, we quoted Kelley’s outspoken position on sin: “From His perspective it’s not you doing the sinning, but the sin that still lives within you.” The gargantuan implication of this seemingly tiny error is the suggestion that we might as well continue in sin so that Grace might abound. This a direct assault on Rom 6:1 and also the direct cause of so much rottenness in society, strengthening satan's sought-for “New World Order” and very badly discrediting the Church of God.


In a recently released Bible study, Jack Kelley is literally doing an about-turn!  This is of course good news, but it is being couched in words that might make it overlooked by many people already deceived into OSAS; and who need to retrace their steps back into the light of God.

Significantly, Kelley now teaches that even though the “Union” of a believer is unconditional  and irrevocably secured at the point of the new birth, it must still be serviced by “Fellowship.” Describing this fellowship as “a little more complicated (than Union)”, Kelley  agrees it includes abhorrence and regular confession of sins, coupled with continued obedience to the commandments of God.  Of course these are the very points of contention in OSAS where people are taught they have absolute no further responsibility in “working out their salvation” as such acts as confession of sins and obedience to the instructions of the Lord constitute “Works” being added to “Grace”.  

After expounding the traditional OSAS teaching of salvation, Jack Kelley delves into his Union and Fellowship teaching, which he suggests is necessary so that many OSAS-affirming believers may no longer ”live such defeated lives” which apparently is resulting in droves getting “discouraged and even stop praying and attending church.”  He also addressed the issue of Gift and Prize. Traditionally, OSAS teachers give the impression that it is no big deal losing the Prize, once we can keep the Gift.  That singular teaching is however the drive-killer which makes OSAS-affirming christians unwilling to make the efforts to resist sin, if necessary to the point of death (“Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin “ - Heb 12:4).  
 
Hopefully people who have been deceived into this error will recognize all these shifting grounds which the Jack Kelleys of this world are not quite willing to boldly admit.
We paste below this concluding portion of Kelley’s article.  The entire article may be read at https://www.raptureforums.com/eternal-security/
 
Union And Fellowship
"If the Doctrine of Eternal Security is so clear then why all the disagreement about it? I’ve found two reasons. The first is the two-sided nature of our relationship with the Lord. I call one side Union. It’s eternal and unconditional, based only on our belief. Ephesians 1:13-14 describes our Union with God, sealed and guaranteed. Once we’re born again, we can’t become unborn. It’s good forever. The Holy Spirit is sealed within us from our first moment of belief until the day of redemption.

"I call the other side Fellowship and it’s a bit more complicated. Fellowship is that state of continual closeness to God that enables Him to bless us in our daily lives, by making things happen for us and protecting us from attack. It’s like He’s teamed up with us to give us a supernatural advantage. Fellowship is defined by 1 John 1:8-9 as being both Earthly and conditional upon our behavior. Even as believers, as long as we’re here on Earth we’ll continue to sin. Since God can’t abide in the presence of sin, our unconfessed sins interrupt our Earthly relationship with Him and may deprive us of blessings we might have otherwise received. We’re still saved in the eternal sense, but out of Fellowship here on Earth.

"When we’re out of Fellowship, we’re legitimate targets for our enemy’s mischief, just like Job was. His sin was self-righteousness and because he wouldn’t confess it, God had to let Satan afflict him in order to bring him to his senses. For a New Testament illustration, look at the parable of the Prodigal Son. (Luke 15:11-32) Like the younger son, we’ll still belong to our Father’s family, but won’t receive any of its blessings while we’re out of Fellowship. And like both Job and the Prodigal, when we return to our Father and confess our sins, we’re immediately purified from all unrighteousness and restored to Fellowship.

"One reason that many Christians live such defeated lives is that having only learned about the Union part of being a believer, they only know that God has forgiven their sins and that they’ll go to be with Him when they die or are Raptured. They don’t realize that they still need to confess every time they sin to stay in Fellowship. And so, being deprived of God’s providence, they may become discouraged and even stop praying and attending church. Other believers, who don’t understand the dual relationship either, look at the mess they’re in and think they must have lost their salvation. Like Job’s friends, they look in God’s Word for confirmation, and by taking verses out of context, believe they have found the proof.

"Union and Fellowship are not just New Testament ideas. In the Old Testament, even when Israel was being obedient in thought and action, doing their best to please God, the priests still had to sacrifice a lamb on the altar every morning and every evening for the sins of the people. 1 John 1:9 is the New Testament equivalent of those daily sacrifices for sin. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. It was written for believers who are already saved, but are in danger of being out of Fellowship because of their sins."


Thursday, December 21, 2017

Trump Threatens To Hit Them Where it Hurts if They Vote Against Jerusalem -(from JewishPress.com)


Photo Credit: WhiteHouse.gov

U.S. President Donald J. Trump
U.S. President Donald Trump warned allies and others Wednesday they could lose their foreign aid if they vote in favor of a United Nations General Assembly resolution on Thursday slamming his recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
The warning came during a news conference with journalists at the White House in advance of the emergency special UNGA session called at the request of Arab and Muslim-majority nations.


“They take hundreds of millions of dollars and even billions of dollars, and then they vote against us,” Trump said, according to Reuters. “Well, we’re watching those votes. Let them vote against us. We’ll save a lot. We don’t care.”

U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley likewise warned select American allies and others in a letter she sent on Wednesday, “To be clear, we are not asking that other countries move their embassies to Jerusalem . . . but simply asking that you acknowledge the historical friendship, partnership, and support we have extended and respect our decision about our own embassy… The president will be watching this vote carefully and has requested I report back on those who voted against us.”

Haley's Letter:
“As you know, the General Assembly is considering a resolution about President Trump’s recent decision on Jerusalem,” her letter reads. “As you consider your vote, I want you to know the President and the U.S. take this vote personally.
“Twenty-two years ago, the U.S. Congress declared that Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of Israel, and that the U.S. embassy should be moved to Jerusalem. President Trump affirmed that declaration by officially recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. However, the President’s announcement does not effect (sic) final status negotiations in any way, including the specific boundaries of Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem,” the letter continued.
“The President also made sure to support the status quo of Jerusalem’s holy sites, and did not advocate changes to arrangements at the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif.
“The U.S. announcement is an acknowledgment that peace is best advanced, not set back, when all parties are honest with each other about the basic fact that Jerusalem has been the capital of Israel since the country’s founding nearly seventy years ago. The President clearly voiced support for a two-state solution if that’s what the parties agree to and the U.S. commitment to peace.
“I know that many in the General Assembly are also committed to the cause of peace and I ask that you consider whether a GA resolution contributes to the heated rhetoric and violence.
“To be clear, we are not asking that other countries move their embassies to Jerusalem . . . but simply asking that you acknowledge the historical friendship, partnership, and support we have extended and respect our decision about our own embassy.
“The president will be watching this vote carefully and has requested I report back on those who voted against us. “Thank you for your consideration, and please do not hesitate to contact my team with any questions or concerns.
My very best,
Nikki
Nikki R. Haley | Ambassador and Permanent Representative

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Why Jerusalem Recognition Matters - By Ron Cantor

I cannot remember another time, in my lifetime, when the world was so completely unified in anger. From France to Turkey, from Hamas to Bernie—the majority of the world believes that President Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital was, at best, a mistake and, at worst, the end of the world!
But don’t fear. This is exactly what the Bible speaks of. Parallel to the restoration of Israel is the rejection of Jerusalem from the nations (Zech. 12:2-3). And nations are irrationally angry over a Jewish Jerusalem. This is a perfect picture of Psalm 2, when the psalmist asks, “Why do the nations rage?” Well, why do they?
And why do the “kings of the earth rise up and the rulers band together against the Lord and against his anointed…”

The answer, in a word, is: Jerusalem.
We see in v. 6 that the Lord rebukes these kings and rulers saying, “I have installed my king on Zion, my holy mountain.” Zion or Tzion in Hebrew, is synonymous with Jerusalem. The kings of the earth take issue with God’s Son (verses 7 and 12) and Jerusalem.
It is interesting that the Muslim world has called for days of rage—the exact word from Psalm 2.

Restoration

And yet, I’ve seen many believers fret over President Trump’s announcement, saying it is irresponsible, racist towards Palestinians, inconsequential, a impediment to peace, etc., completely missing the spiritual significance of it. The word Zion means signpost. Jerusalem is a sign to us.
  • From the 1880s to the present, the Jewish people have been returning en masse to Israel.
  • In 1920, the League of Nations (U.N.) adopted the Balfour Declaration as international law, saying that the region of Palestine would be developed into a homeland for the Jewish people.
  • In 1947, the U.N. voted to partition the remaining 20% of Palestine (80% was given to create the new nation of Jordan) into another Arab state and a Jewish state. (The Arabs rejected it.)
  • In 1948, Israel became a nation.
  • In 1967, Jerusalem was reunified after the Six Day War and the Old City was recovered.
  • From 1984 to 2000, tens of thousands of Ethiopian Jews and around one million Russian-speaking came home to Israel.
  • Fast forward to December 6th, 2017: Jerusalem is recognized by the most powerful nation on earth as Israel’s capital.

Also in the New Testament

The full restoration of Israel is prophesied not only in the Old Testament, but in the New Testament. When Yeshua was asked by His disciples after His resurrection, “Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?” (Acts 1:6), He does not rebuke them for asking a stupid question. For any student of prophets, this was the most logical question.
“This is what the Lord Almighty says: “I am very jealous for Zion; I am burning with jealousy for her … I will return to Zion and dwell in Jerusalem … I will save my people from the countries of the east and the west. I will bring them back to live in Jerusalem; they will be my people, and I will be faithful and righteous to them as their God.” (Zech. 8:2-3, 7-8)
There are dozens of passages such as this. So, of course the disciples would ask about the restoration of Israel. Yeshua responds:
“He said to them: ‘It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority. But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.’”
Did you see that? Many people miss it. Yeshua clearly indicates that the Father has set the time and date for Israel’s restoration. This why I have said, if President Trump is truly a type of Cyrus (to be clear, no one has ever said that Isaiah 44-45 was referring to Trump, but merely that Trump may have a Cyrus-type calling), then he will favor Zion. That is what Cyrus is known for. A Gentile head of state gets behind the restoration of Israel. And while Trump did not do this when we expected it in May, during Jerusalem’s 50-year anniversary, he has done it now.
My friend and mentor Asher Intrater paraphrases Yeshua’s response in his new book Alignment (free download here) and I think it is brilliant.
“You have asked Me to restore David’s kingdom to Israel. The prophets envisioned a much wider kingdom which would cover the whole earth (Is. 42, 49). Let’s not settle for just David’s kingdom; let’s go for the whole vision of the prophets. Let’s not set up the kingdom in Israel until we offer salvation to all the peoples of the earth. When they all have a chance to be part of the worldwide kingdom, let’s return and restore the kingdom to Israel. The kingdom will start in Israel as Isaiah said, with its capital in Jerusalem, but it will cover the whole earth.
“I will establish the kingdom government on earth when I return. For now, proclaim both personal salvation and kingdom authority, from Jerusalem to the ends of the earth. In the meantime, there is no need for the nation of Israel to be here until it is time for My return and the kingdom restoration. Therefore, Israel will be scattered while the gospel goes to the Gentiles (Matt. 24:14). Then in the period before I return, the nation of Israel will be restored, so that there will be a place for Me to return and set up the capital of My kingdom.”

Manipulating Scripture

I heard a replacement theology pastor share the other day from Matthew 23, how God is not really concerned anymore with Jerusalem and, in fact, the Jewish people rejected the Messiah in Jerusalem. He quotes Yeshua:
“Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing. Look, your house is left to you desolate.” (Matt. 23:37-38)
Well, if we stop, it sure looks like Yeshua is done with those pesky Jews. That is what I call intellectual dishonesty. My dear brother was manipulating his hearers because he didn’t read the next verse.
“For I tell you, you will not see me again until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’” (Matt. 23:39)
Read differently, Yeshua was saying to the Jews of Jerusalem, “You will see me again when you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.” The phrase in Hebrew, Blessed is he who comes is a greeting. When someone comes back to Israel from traveling, we say, “Baruch haba” or “Blessed is he who comes.” And Zechariah clearly says that the Jews of Jerusalem will welcome Him back.
“And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son.” (Zech. 12:10)
Yeshua left the Mount of Olives with the angel saying, “He’s coming back the same way.” (Acts 1)  Zechariah 14 shows a restored Jerusalem being attacked by the nations, and “then the Lord will go out and fight against those nations, as he fights on a day of battle. On that day his feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, east of Jerusalem.” (Zech. 14:3-4)
Beloved, again, Zion means signpost and each step of restoration in Israel is a sign that we are one step closer to His coming. Maranatha. Come, oh Lord!

Thursday, December 7, 2017

Statement by President Trump on Jerusalem

Diplomatic Reception Room
1:07 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. When I came into office, I promised to look at the world’s challenges with open eyes and very fresh thinking. We cannot solve our problems by making the same failed assumptions and repeating the same failed strategies of the past. Old challenges demand new approaches.
My announcement today marks the beginning of a new approach to conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.
In 1995, Congress adopted the Jerusalem Embassy Act, urging the federal government to relocate the American embassy to Jerusalem and to recognize that that city -- and so importantly -- is Israel’s capital. This act passed Congress by an overwhelming bipartisan majority and was reaffirmed by a unanimous vote of the Senate only six months ago.
Yet, for over 20 years, every previous American president has exercised the law’s waiver, refusing to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem or to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital city.
Presidents issued these waivers under the belief that delaying the recognition of Jerusalem would advance the cause of peace. Some say they lacked courage, but they made their best judgments based on facts as they understood them at the time. Nevertheless, the record is in. After more than two decades of waivers, we are no closer to a lasting peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. It would be folly to assume that repeating the exact same formula would now produce a different or better result.
Therefore, I have determined that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
While previous presidents have made this a major campaign promise, they failed to deliver. Today, I am delivering.
I've judged this course of action to be in the best interests of the United States of America and the pursuit of peace between Israel and the Palestinians. This is a long-overdue step to advance the peace process and to work towards a lasting agreement.
Israel is a sovereign nation with the right like every other sovereign nation to determine its own capital. Acknowledging this as a fact is a necessary condition for achieving peace.
It was 70 years ago that the United States, under President Truman, recognized the State of Israel. Ever since then, Israel has made its capital in the city of Jerusalem -- the capital the Jewish people established in ancient times. Today, Jerusalem is the seat of the modern Israeli government. It is the home of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, as well as the Israeli Supreme Court. It is the location of the official residence of the Prime Minister and the President. It is the headquarters of many government ministries.
For decades, visiting American presidents, secretaries of state, and military leaders have met their Israeli counterparts in Jerusalem, as I did on my trip to Israel earlier this year.
Jerusalem is not just the heart of three great religions, but it is now also the heart of one of the most successful democracies in the world. Over the past seven decades, the Israeli people have built a country where Jews, Muslims, and Christians, and people of all faiths are free to live and worship according to their conscience and according to their beliefs.
Jerusalem is today, and must remain, a place where Jews pray at the Western Wall, where Christians walk the Stations of the Cross, and where Muslims worship at Al-Aqsa Mosque.
However, through all of these years, presidents representing the United States have declined to officially recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. In fact, we have declined to acknowledge any Israeli capital at all.
But today, we finally acknowledge the obvious: that Jerusalem is Israel’s capital. This is nothing more, or less, than a recognition of reality. It is also the right thing to do. It's something that has to be done.
That is why, consistent with the Jerusalem Embassy Act, I am also directing the State Department to begin preparation to move the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. This will immediately begin the process of hiring architects, engineers, and planners, so that a new embassy, when completed, will be a magnificent tribute to peace.
In making these announcements, I also want to make one point very clear: This decision is not intended, in any way, to reflect a departure from our strong commitment to facilitate a lasting peace agreement. We want an agreement that is a great deal for the Israelis and a great deal for the Palestinians. We are not taking a position of any final status issues, including the specific boundaries of the Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem, or the resolution of contested borders. Those questions are up to the parties involved.
The United States remains deeply committed to helping facilitate a peace agreement that is acceptable to both sides. I intend to do everything in my power to help forge such an agreement. Without question, Jerusalem is one of the most sensitive issues in those talks. The United States would support a two-state solution if agreed to by both sides.
In the meantime, I call on all parties to maintain the status quo at Jerusalem's holy sites, including the Temple Mount, also known as Haram al-Sharif.
Above all, our greatest hope is for peace, the universal yearning in every human soul. With today’s action, I reaffirm my administration’s longstanding commitment to a future of peace and security for the region.
There will, of course, be disagreement and dissent regarding this announcement. But we are confident that ultimately, as we work through these disagreements, we will arrive at a peace and a place far greater in understanding and cooperation.
This sacred city should call forth the best in humanity, lifting our sights to what it is possible; not pulling us back and down to the old fights that have become so totally predictable. Peace is never beyond the grasp of those willing to reach.
So today, we call for calm, for moderation, and for the voices of tolerance to prevail over the purveyors of hate. Our children should inherit our love, not our conflicts.
I repeat the message I delivered at the historic and extraordinary summit in Saudi Arabia earlier this year: The Middle East is a region rich with culture, spirit, and history. Its people are brilliant, proud, and diverse, vibrant and strong. But the incredible future awaiting this region is held at bay by bloodshed, ignorance, and terror.
Vice President Pence will travel to the region in the coming days to reaffirm our commitment to work with partners throughout the Middle East to defeat radicalism that threatens the hopes and dreams of future generations.
It is time for the many who desire peace to expel the extremists from their midst. It is time for all civilized nations, and people, to respond to disagreement with reasoned debate –- not violence.
And it is time for young and moderate voices all across the Middle East to claim for themselves a bright and beautiful future.
So today, let us rededicate ourselves to a path of mutual understanding and respect. Let us rethink old assumptions and open our hearts and minds to possible and possibilities. And finally, I ask the leaders of the region -- political and religious; Israeli and Palestinian; Jewish and Christian and Muslim -- to join us in the noble quest for lasting peace.
Thank you. God bless you. God bless Israel. God bless the Palestinians. And God bless the United States. Thank you very much. Thank you.
(The proclamation is signed.)
END 1:19 P.M. EST

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

ON TITHES AND “BEERING” IN THE CHURCH



Never heard of the fella called “Daddy Freeze” (Mr Ifedapo Olarinde) before. I guess he must be some sort of clown, especially reading his half-baked teaching on tithes, and his announced crusade against Pentecostal preachers who ride personal jets to do their jobs, or establish high-quality universities which not all members of their congregations can afford.
.
Don’t know if he is claiming to be a teacher of the word of God, but a good number of folks seem to be taking seriously his suggestions that rather than pay their tithes to worship God and take care of needs in the Church, people should use their tithes to buy beer or some other alcoholic drink of their choice and take these to drink at Church!

When the revered Pastor Enoch Adeboye observed that “even mad people know you don’t go to Church to drink beer,”  Mr Olarinde sneeringly suggested the statement is based merely on “sentiments” and does not square up with the teachings of the Scriptures.  Obviously, Pastor Adeboye is not likely to have the time to oblige Mr Olarinde of the response he was demanding for. We therefore offer the man and those insisting on a response the following comments.

Yes it is true that the Mosaic Law prescribes, in addition to the regular tithes payable to the Levites,(Numbers 18:21,24) additional tithes (every three years) for the poor and needy (Deut 14:28-29; 26:12-13), and also for the family to eat with rejoicing in the presence of the LORD in the “place” He prescribes.(Deut.14:22-27)

All the extensive preaching by Mr Ifedapo “Freeze” Olarinde on permissibility of wine and beer in the Christian culinary is absolutely unnecessary.   Most folks are very familiar with the basic difference between getting drunk and having a sip of wine recreationally. And that the latter does not constitute a “sin”. Of course, the Freezes of this world are not likely to see the multitude of Bible verses that additionally teach that not all that is allowed is expedient or beneficial.(1 Cor. 6:12, 10:23)  Even in the Old Testament, there are scriptures that aver that wine and beer are not for “Kings and Priests” who need to be sober at all times.(Prov. 31:4-5)  Why, there is even the well-known story of an old testament Priest, Jonadab of the Rechab lineage who actually forbidded his children from ever tasting alcohol (Jer 35).

But as earlier said, the issue here is not about the permissibility or otherwise of drinking alcohol; but the reasonableness of going to Church to do so. The golden passage latched onto by Freeze is Deut. 14:22-26.  It is actually interesting to see at least for once, minions of the antichrist rooting for a text in the Old Testament, which ordinarily they insist is no longer relevant. In Deut 14, the Law permittted people to take whatever they considered as delicacy, including alcohol or beer, and consume these with rejoicing before the Lord at “the place” He so designates.

The “place” is obviously the Temple at Jerusalem.  But the primary reason for the trip is not just to go there and feast on the tithes before the Lord.  Actually there are specified Feasts during which a Jew is required to go up to Jerusalem to worship and celebrate. This third type of tithes is provision set aside for the family feeding during these Feasts.(see details at https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1958/09/the-three-tithes-of-the-old-testament)

Furthermore, and more importantly, the Temple was never a one-compartment building.  Most Israelites never make it beyond the Outer Courts.  That’s where they may eat their family tithes, which might include drinking their beer and alcohol in moderation.(see details at http://www.biblestudy.org/biblepic/interior-diagram-of-temple-in-jerusalem.html).  But where the Levites/priests operate and eat their own tithes is the Holy Place which they never approach until they have washed at the Laver, and are garbed in special consecrated robes for service. The Holy Place in the Inner Court is certainly no place for beering or frivolities! Even up till today (without a standing Temple), priests in Judaism are not allowed to as much as pronounce blessing on people even after a single cup of wine (see http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/581082/jewish/What-is-Judaisms-take-on-alcohol-consumption.htm).  For Levites who wish to consume alcohol, there are myriads of side chambers (really like their private living quarters) where they may do so – still in the Temple (see for example Jer 35:1-5).  In other words, if they so desire, they may drink wine recreationally in their chambers, but not “at work” in the Holy Place.

But in the Old Testament Temple, the real place of the presence of the LORD is the Holy of Holies.  The New Testament anti-type of the Holy Place is the Church.  Even Freeze and his disciples seem to recognize that the Church is more than the building (although they at the same time refuse to recognize that Christians are Priests! – 1 Pet. 2:9, Rev. 5:10, etc). The Church is indeed the coming together of the saints in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ – with the assured presence of the Lord guaranteed (Mat. 18:20).  When the veil was torn from the Temple as the Lord Jesus concluded the ultimate sacrifice at Calvary, the Holy of Holies and the Holy Place merged to become a single compartment (Mat. 27:50-51).  Going to “Church” today is therefore to be likened to entering into the Holy of Holies in Judaism.

 It certainly will take more than a mad fellow to contemplate going into the Holy of Holies to consume beer!

As for all the howlers that Pentecostal preachers are threating to curse those who refuse to pay tithes, the reality is that it is God who Himself warned that those who fail to discern between the “holy and the profane,”  and robbing Him of His due tithes, are indeed opening themselves up for curses from Him. No raving pastor here!  (Mal 3:8-9)

One wonders what Freeze and his media flock would have said of the Apostle Peter in the early Church.  In Acts 5:1-10 is recorded the story of a couple who were physically instantaneous slain at the pronouncements of the Apostle.  The Freezes of this world would certainly have had much to pontificate about prestigious pastors who go about killing people who offered only half of the price of their properties just for the offence of putting such forth as the full price.  And by the way, do you talk about giving tithes in a culture where people brought ALL they have to the feet of the Apostles?  If only the 21st Century Church will retrace her steps back to the ways of the early Church.  But certainly NOT by keeping away tithes from the Church and diverting them for “beering” in the assembly of the saints!

As the African proverb goes, “Half education is more dangerous than no education.”  It is half-baked education that makes people insist that the universe came into existence on its own without a creator (Evolution Theory). Likewise, it is half-baked education that makes wanna-be scholars go around viciously teaching that it is okay for a Christian to commit sins; and that confessing, repenting or asking forgiveness of such sins is the only “sin” that God would not tolerate or overlook! That is the core tenet in the Once-saved-always-saved doctrine.  It is exactly the same half-baked bible education that makes people like Mr Ifedapo Olarinde, aka Freeze not see what even a regular mad man on the street would instinctively recognize: you just don’t go to Church to consume alcohol!

Monday, November 20, 2017

Planned Parenthood Teams up with Satanists to Promote Abortion in Missouri (USA)

Missouri has reportedly doubled its abortion capacity this year “thanks to the Satanic Temple and Planned Parenthood,” who have worked in tandem to fight the state’s restrictions on abortion.

(From http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/13/planned-parenthood-teams-up-with-satanists-to-promote-abortion-in-missouri/)

With some of the most clearly defined regulations on abortion in the nation, Missouri had managed to lower the number of abortion facilities to a single clinic, but a second Missouri clinic opened its doors recently and two others plan on following soon.

Planned Parenthood has battled against state regulations requiring abortion clinics to meet the same surgical center standards as full hospitals and for their doctors to have hospital privileges, and in April a federal court sided with the abortion giant.

U.S. District Judge Howard Sachs granted a preliminary injunction invalidating requirements for the state’s abortion clinics to meet standards for surgical centers and for their doctors to have hospital privileges, citing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down similar restrictions in Texas, which deemed those laws unnecessary and unconstitutional.

“Missouri has not complied with that decision,” Sachs, of the Western District of Missouri in Kansas City, wrote.

Shortly afterward, Planned Parenthood expressed its intention to expand its abortion services in the state. On Monday, Planned Parenthood Great Plains announced plans to offer abortion services at two more clinics in Missouri, including its midtown Kansas City clinic, which now offers medication abortion services.

The Satanic Temple has often lent its muscle to pro-abortion efforts alongside Planned Parenthood, and in this case has pressured Missouri legislators and worked through the courts to bring about a relaxing of abortion restrictions, according to reports. One of the Temple’s fundamental tenets is that “One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.”

On Monday, the Satanic Temple argued in a Missouri court that the state’s abortion restrictions violate members’ rights to free religious practice. The organization challenged two Missouri laws: one that requires patients to look at anti-abortion literature and another that obliges them to wait 72 hours between their initial consultations and second appointments for their abortions.

Satanic Temple members have argued that their religion prizes rational, independent thought and that forcing Satanists to read anti-abortion pamphlets and “consider a religious proposition with which they do not agree” during the 72-hour waiting period constitutes a violation of their beliefs.

read more at http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/13/planned-parenthood-teams-up-with-satanists-to-promote-abortion-in-missouri/