The climax came for India in the case of the
23 year old medical student, Jyoti Singh Pandey, who was beaten and gang-raped
for about an hour on the evening of December 16 2012, in a public bus, while
traveling with a male companion. She
later died of organ failure despite concerted medical efforts at Singapore. The
spontaneous mass protests from outraged Indians finally seemed to catch the
attention of the government, and legal actions were initiated. Official legal verdict on the accused rapists
is expected to be announced on 25 July 2013.(see http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2013/01/07/father-of-new-delhi-rape-victim-tell-the-world-my-daughters-name/)
But watch out for the sadistic new
sexuality people! We can safely predict
that they will in their characteristic manner pounce on the subject to exploit
it for their evil agenda - thus befuddling the fact that according to their
doctrines and teachings, (well documented in their books), every sexual
expression man can think of, including rape, is legitimate. Please see CA! Vol 8 no 5 or here - http://www.cwfa.org/images/content/kinsey-women_11_03.pdf, or http://www.whale.to/b/kinsey.html
for more details on the many atrocities of Dr Alfred Kinsey, the father of
sexuality education. In fact, the exact
same academic justification goes for all the concepts on the sexuality slippery
slope - ranging from masturbation to
pornography, to promiscuity, to incest, to rape, to paedophilia, to
homosexuality, to bestiality!
One of the often hotly debated factors
in the issue of rape is to what extent has the victim “invited” the action on
herself – either foolishly unconsciously or otherwise. However, it is probably more important (but
sadly more neglected) to discuss such factors as the influence of the myriads
of explicit sexual scenes and
pornography that now pervade our environment, and which have been glibly
accepted by us– in the movies and “arts”.
Or the evolutionary portrayal of man as nothing better than an animal;
and who needs to vent his animalistic passion from time to time rather than
“repress” them to his “detriment” . New
sexuality people are the unseen forces pushing such factors.
Here then is a great irony: New
sexuality people promote provocative near-nude dressing, together with
pornography in the society; they similarly encourage people expressing and
experimenting with all manners of sexual desires, rather than repressing these
“legitimate natural” urges, etc. Yet,
largely because they conduct their activities under vague omnibus titles like
“reproductive health” (for which they provide fantastic “philanthropic”
fundings), they have managed to remain respectable in many countries of the
world (see http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/). To the extent that they could even claim to
be at the vanguard of protecting female folks from incidents like rape!
Why, if only the rest of us would absorb
their new sexuality teachings, terms like ‘rape’ will probably not even exist
anymore, as everybody learns to have a “better” appreciation of sex and human
sexuality. After all, in the words of
Alfred Kinsey, who commissioned and documented hundreds of rapes for his
“academic” studies, "The only difference between rape and a good time
depends on whether the girl’s parents were awake when she finally came
home." [Book review: The Kinsey Corruption] The Man Who Mainstreamed
Perversion.
It’s really amazing the world could
continue to be fooled by such clearly contradictory blatant hyprocritical
agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment