Saturday, October 10, 2009

US EPA REDEPLOYS STAFF WHO PRESENTED SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING

With New World Order advocates already making good progress in their agenda of using the Environmental platform to gather the nations of Planet Earth under a common (theirs) authority, any report threatening to throw spanners in the work – even if based on sound evidence and logic – is certainly a pain in the neck and is most unwelcome.
This is what Alan Carlin, an employee at US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Center for Environmental Economics has found out, following his 98-page internal report in which he questioned EPA’s clamour for regulating gases like carbon dioxide as a way to reduce global warming. According to a news item on Foxnews (June 29), Carlin’s report had shown that the information the EPA was using was out of date, and that even as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have increased, global temperatures have declined. According to FOX news, “Specifically, the report noted that global temperatures were on a downward trend over the past 11 years, that scientists do not necessarily believe that storms will become more frequent or more intense due to global warming, and that the theory that temperatures will cause Greenland ice to rapidly melt has been "greatly diminished."”
The response to the report was swift. Carlin got an e-mail from his immediate boss, the Center’s Director Al McGartland, pulling him off the climate change issue. "I don't want you to spend any additional EPA time on climate change. No papers, no research, etc., at least until we see what EPA is going to do with climate," McGartland wrote. In another communication, McGartland indicated he was under pressure from above to act the way he did: "It was reassigning you or losing my job, and I didn't want to lose my job," Carlin paraphrased what he claimed McGartland told him.
Does this kind of situation get someone thinking what’s really going on? We pray it does!
Click here to read Carlin's report. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/projects/pdf/epa_report2.pdf

No comments: