Vaccines,
Vaccine Deployment, and “New Vaccines”
(LSF SPECIAL REPORT ON VACCINATION)
August 2025
Introduction to Part 1:
What is the link between GMOs, LGBTQ+, and Vaccination? This was a key thread examined in our new book Surely I Come Quickly.
Whilst many are now aware of the $200b being devoted by Mr Bill Gates to drive the above Siamese-triplets, few seem to remember that the EU had earlier put $150b on the table to prosecute the same issues in African and the Pacific countries through the infamous, now largely forgotten Samoa Agreement. Both funding (from Bill Gates and the EU) have a timeline of 20 years.
In our new Fact Sheet, we have prepared basic facts showing how the once-respected product, Vaccines, are being manipulated, re-defined and re-formulated, to align with the globalists’ agenda being driven by the Vaccination-GMO-LGBTQ+ trio. Most of us will find some of these facts unbelievable and downright outrageous. Yet our children (especially) are being targeted with these products in the name of good health - as decreed by Mr Gates and promoted by his local disciples.
The Fact Sheet is a joint ChurchArise – LivingScience publication, and is primarily addressed to the Body of Christ who is the main target of the new drive to promote these products. The 22-page document will be made available, in a day or two, for free downloads on the websites of both Churcharise! (https://churcharise.org) and LivingScience Foundation (https://lsfnigeria.org). However, to encourage those too busy to read lengthy articles, we will serialize the document and post them on social media beginning from today through Friday this week.
Please read and share. Blessings.
=====================================================================
Part 1
of 5 Monday 25th August
I. Introduction
i. Unbundling
an Entangled Subject
The crucial
subject of vaccination is actually comprised of three related, but very
different issues, viz: Vaccines, their modes of Deployment, and
so-called “New Vaccines”. The “new
vaccines” refer first to various combinations of existing vaccines into one
shot; and subsequently to products based on entirely novel principles/formats different
from the traditional ones. At the
present time, the definition of what constitutes a vaccine has even been revised,
such that vaccines are no longer specifically required to prevent infection, and
transmission of pathogens. As we show later in this document, any product can
now be labelled “vaccine” once it can stimulate an appropriate immune response
in the body.
The key
issues involved in this subject are largely uncomplicated, and can be discerned
by simple common-sense analyses. To
simplify our discussion still, however, we must begin by unveiling the major
complication in the whole matter - the man Bill Gates. This self-proclaimed “philanthropist-capitalist”
is the world’s foremost investor in vaccines, and he insists on setting the
applicable rules of engagement. Even though he has no training in medicine,
medical personnel and institutions worldwide reverently defer to his
pronouncements, especially on the subject of vaccination. Recently, Mr Gates announced he would be
giving away $200 billion (90% of his entire fortune), over the next 20 years
[1]. He, of course, will not be throwing away the money to charity; but rather
deploying it to drive values and products he is keen on imprinting on the
world. Vaccination happens to be the
principal among these.
Bill Gates
is very open about his beliefs and convictions. Basically, he is concerned that
the world is overpopulated and that this is putting considerable strain on
available natural resources, as well as exacerbating global warming. These, he believes, would eventually result
in some irreversible planetary catastrophe sometime in the future. Justifying his colossal investments in
vaccine development and global deployment, Mr Gates explained at a 2010 Ted
Talk, that “New Vaccines” are one of the chief instruments that will help reduce
global warming -- by systematically doing away with 1.5 billion people [2].
Though
censored out by mainstream media, the speech is widely presented and discussed
on the internet. Stating that the global
population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates, in what could be a slip of the
tongue, said: “If we do a really great job on New Vaccines, Healthcare,
Reproductive Health Services [i.e. abortion], we could lower that by
perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.” See
video at https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero.
A
multitude of “Fact Checkers”, mostly sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, have laboured to explain that what Mr Gates actually meant about “New
Vaccines” was quite different from the plain meaning of what he said!
At the
present time, Mr Gates $200 billion is at work, being disbursed to so-called media
Influencers, charged to re-interpret to us what Mr Gates statement was supposed
to “actually mean”. We should be aware
that these Influencers are drawn from our locality, and invariably would include
our neighbours, relatives, and church members!
This Special Report will be highlighting key clarifications we must
demand, when presented with such new narratives. The consequences of our taking wrong actions
on vaccination could be very dire, certainly much dire than some projected
consequences of “global warming.” Among
other consequences, it could easily result in the vast reduction of human
population which Mr Gates glowingly speaks about.
ii. Summary
of our Position
For 10
years, the LivingScience Foundation has endeavoured to educate the public on vaccination,
clarifying the important differences between the related concepts of Vaccines, Vaccine
Deployment, and “New Vaccines”. In our opinion, vaccines on their own, are to
be celebrated and embraced as God-given, potentially life-saving products, derived
from the labour and ingenuity of hardworking and well-meaning scientists.
However, as for any other medical product, marketing vaccines for
indiscriminate mass deployment or under dubious scheduling and unending dosing,
is fraught with several serious demerits. These potential demerits turn into
causes for serious alarm when we see the definition of what constitutes a
“vaccine” being changed to incorporate “new vaccines” based on new principles
and extremely controversial new technology. In this regard, it is particularly concerning
that the “new vaccines,” according to alterations made to definitions on the
website of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are no longer
required to possess sterilizing immunity (that is, to prevent infection or
transmission of diseases – the traditional purpose of vaccines) [3]. The
mRNA-based COVID vaccines are a prime example of this new development [4].
iii. Conditions
for Justifying a Vaccine Solution
Useful as vaccines could be, their deployment whether in individuals (for
example the rabies vaccine for the occupationally-exposed Vet doctor) or in the
general population (for example the COVID vaccine) should be based on
carefully-evaluated benefit-to-risk considerations. Factors that would determine the merit or
otherwise of a vaccine solution include 1) Efficacy – how well does it
work? 2) Duration of the efficacy - how long after full dosage
before the efficacy wanes and “boosters” become necessary? 3) Target biological
endpoint and its relevance - What exactly does it “prevent” – new infections?
hospitalizations? 4) Safety - are the
health risks introduced by the intervention justifiable relative to the
benefits? 5) the Logistics involved in its procurement, storage, and delivery
(for instance the number of doses required for full dosage: the higher this
number, the higher the chances of non-full compliance and consequent
failure). 6) the economic Costs of the whole enterprise, and
7) possible Spin-off benefits for other sectors.
Furthermore, the choice of a vaccine solution should be evaluated against
other possible solutions, including primary prevention of the infection in the
first place, use of prophylaxis, or prompt therapeutic solution - where
effective drugs exist. For infections that are not life-threatening, recovery
with prophylaxis and drugs helps the body to acquire a more robust natural immunity
than what is obtained from manufactured vaccines. Indeed, vaccines serve as light infections
that provoke natural immunity, only that they usually are designed to target specific
strains of the disease-causing pathogens. (While this might produce faster
result, it is also less robust). Above
all, a vaccine solution must be justified not only on its own merit, but also
on how well it fits in with other solutions, complementing them rather than
competing with, not to talk of jeopardizing, them.
The seminal article by Robert F Kennedy (Jnr) presented incontrovertible
historical data establishing that the contribution usually attributed to
vaccines in the reduction of childhood mortality is hugely exaggerated [5]. It turns out that in most cases, in the
western countries usually cited, mortality had already plummeted before the
first vaccines were ever developed.
1.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2e87lzqkdo
2.
https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero.
4.
Wahl I, Wardemann H. Sterilizing immunity: Understanding COVID-19. Immunity.
2022 Dec 13;55(12):2231-2235. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.10.017. Epub 2022 Oct
24. PMID: 36309008; PMCID: PMC9595357.
5. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rfk-jr-daniel-pinchbeck-vaccines-eliminating-mortality/
No comments:
Post a Comment