Measurements of
the formation rate of craters on the moon, now made possible by the
availability of high resolution cameras and image processing systems, have yielded another clear-cut evidence that
conventional dating techniques and theories on the age of the Earth/Moon are
seriously faulty. The study by astronomers at Arizona State University and
Cornell University in the United States found that far many new craters were
being formed on the moon than had been previously thought was possible. And since one of the standard ways of
estimating the age of the moon is based on the number of craters counted and
the assumed rate of their formation, there is obvious need to revise the age
ascribed to the moon, and consequently, to the earth.
According to the
report, written by correspondent of the popular version of the journal
“Nature”, the revision required is massive, and would move the age of the moon
from “a timescale of millions of years, to only thousands. “
One of the
researchers was quoted: “I’m excited by
the fact that we can see the regolith evolve and churn—a process that was
believed to take hundreds of thousands to millions of years to occur—in images
acquired over the past several years.”
This new age
assignment for the moon is absolutely consistent with other available foolproof
scientific evidences where the standard uniformitarian assumptions are
challenged. Such evidences abound in the
results obtained by the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) in their landmark
RATE Project (see www.icr.org).
Garrett Haleyat: http://christiannews.net/2016/10/17/evidence-of-a-young-moon-study-forces-scientists-to-rethink-lunar-dating-techniques/
No comments:
Post a Comment