Hundreds of children died in Philippines’
botched Vaccine launch |
“(The)
unique safety problem of coronavirus vaccines was discovered 50 years ago while
developing the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine…… (This) ‘paradoxical
immune enhancement phenomenon’ means vaccinated people may still develop the
disease, get sicker and die.”
It
is well-established but hardly mentioned to the general public, that people who
receive ANY of the various vaccines being produced against the SARS COV-2 virus
stand a definite risk of becoming much more susceptible not only to COVID-19
disease, but also to other clinical diseases caused by other strains in the
coronavirus family. This situation,
where vaccination leads to disease enhancement rather than reduction, is known
as Pathogenic
Priming. It arises principally from
autoimmune issues and is the singular reason no vaccine has been approved to
date for any coronavirus since the two decades when the efforts began. In the current developments, proposals have been
made that could presumably address the problem; but under the cover of a
supposed global pandemic that is threatening to decimate the entire world’s
population, the required animal trials to check the efficacy of such ideas have
been skipped! And most people have no clue as to the extent of risks they are
being asked to bear.
Autoimmune problems
refer to the situation where the body’s immune system begins to confuse its own
proteins for foreign dangerous proteins it had been taught (here, by the
vaccine) to vehemently attack and destroy. This occurs because several proteins
in the viral particles could be similar to those found in humans. In COVID-19, every protein in the SARS-CoV-2
has at least one epitope (parts of viral proteins) that matches human proteins
somewhere in the human body. About
one-third of the epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 virus match proteins in the human immune system.
In a nutshell, in
Pathogenic Priming, recipients of a vaccine for a coronavirus like SARS, MERS,
(also applicable for dengue and RSV)
develop appreciable antibodies in response to the vaccination, and on the basis
of this, some impressive efficacy figure is ascribed to the vaccine. There also is not much adverse health effect
apparent at this juncture, so the vaccine gets a clean safety profile as
well.
However the problem
arises when the vaccine recipients are exposed to the “wild virus” (the real
virus from a natural infection rather than one packaged in a vaccine dose), or
an entirely new strain at a future date.
Rather than prove protective, the prior vaccination turns out to render
those vaccinated far more susceptible than they would have been without the
vaccination!
Hints of
Pathogenic priming had been first observed during the development of the failed RSV vaccine
tests in the 1960s. The vaccines not only failed to prevent infection
(as is also the case with current COVID-19 vaccines); 80% of the children
infected required hospitalization, and two children who got exposed to the RSV
died. Immunopathological lung reactions
were also observed in infants and
in animals when they
were challenged naturally (infants) and artificially (animals) after they had
received RSV Vaccine.
The problem
became quite apparent in the early 2000’s in the quest for vaccines against coronaviruses
like SARS-COV-1 and MERS. In the animal trials, the four
most promising vaccines were administered to animals including ferrets,
non-human primates, and mice. All the animals promptly developed a robust
antibody response to coronavirus, and the experiments were adjudged successful.
However, when the vaccinated animals were later exposed to the wild virus, the
results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered
hyper-immune responses including extreme inflammation throughout their
bodies, especially in their lungs. They
all died and the vaccine efforts were halted.
Dr Anthony Fauci
however proceeded with his dengue vaccine in 2014, despite clear evidences of
pathogenic priming, as people who got the vaccine became “incredibly sick” when
they later got exposed to the wild virus.
The vaccine was subsequently administered to 100,000 children in the
Philippines, and again, all appeared to be well until the children finally
encountered wild dengue. They became “horrendously sick” and 600
of them died. Today the Philippine
government is criminally
prosecuting the Philippine health officials who waved the vaccine through.
Another untoward
autoimmune-related condition associated with coronavirus vaccines is antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), also known in related
forms as Paradoxical Immune Enhancement, Cytokine Storm, and Virus Interference,
among others. In ADE, vaccines generate
in addition to the desired neutralizing antibodies that protect against the
target virus, other idiopathic antibodies which facilitate the entrance and rapid replication within the cell, the
very target virus the vaccine was meant to protect against! This is the exact opposite of protecting
someone from an infection; and (especially if the binding antibodies persist
longer than the neutralising ones) it can lead to the vaccinated person becoming
much more susceptible to the disease than he would have been had he remained
unvaccinated. ADE has been demonstrated in
studies on SARS CoV in humans,
ferrets
(liver damage) and non-human
primates (acute lung damage), among a much larger body of literature. It was the reason for the failure of the 2012 attempt to produce
a SARS coronavirus vaccine.
In the ongoing
developments with SARS Cov 2, sober voices calling for caution are being shunned
into silence. Nevertheless, concerns are being
raised “whether vaccine recipients
will develop more severe disease if they are exposed to or infected with
SARS-CoV after neutralizing antibody titers decline” and “ whether recipients
of a SARSCoV vaccine would be at risk of developing pulmonary immunopathology
following infection with an unrelated human coronavirus e.g. 229E, OC43, HKU1
or NL63 that usually causes mild, self- limited disease.”
Writing to a regulatory body in the US on 6th
December, 2020, James Lyons-Weiler, warned: “Since no animal studies
were conducted on older animals, we have no idea of the COVID19 vaccines being
considered will cause pathogenic priming leading to disease enhancement in
the liver, pancreas, spleen, brain, intestines, and central nervous
system. Unqualified recommendations of COVID19 vaccines could lead to a
public health crisis due to disease enhancement that makes 2020 look like a
walk in the park.”
Evidences
currently amassing suggest that “Pathogenic Priming” is already
“Likely Contributing to Serious and Critical Illness and Mortality in COVID-19
via Autoimmunity.” In the United
States, by the end of December 2020, the Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting
System (which is known to capture only
about 1% of adverse health effects) already is bursting with reports of
adverse events, ranging from life-threatening anaphylaxis and emergency room visits to brain inflammation and death. The number of
United States deaths on the VAERS (13 deaths) does not include the 24 deaths
reported (out of a total 193 residents vaccinated) in
a single nursing home in New York. As at 18th January, Norway
is already investigating 33 deaths associated with receipt of COVID-19 vaccine,
while Germany
is investigating 10 deaths! While the
causes of death have been established in some cases, e.g
Dr Gregory Michael (died of acute idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura - ITP), in other cases,
no clear reasons has been adduced for the deaths. According to James Lyons-Weler
and Robert F. Kennedy, it is highly
probable that we are already seeing cases of pathogenic priming!
A
recent review
of ADE noted that the condition is expected to be exacerbated in people who
already have some existing autoimmune disease at the time of their being
vaccinated. Such category of people were actually excluded in the clinical
trials of the vaccines; but it has been pointed out that most people with
autoimmune diseases are probably not aware of their condition! In the USA, estimates of this sub-population
range from 14.7
million to 23.5 million. Thanks to
the excellent review
by Adelowo and Bello (2014), it is now understood that contrary to long-held
views, systemic autoimmune diseases are “not so rare” in Nigerians afterall,
and that the challenge lies more with getting a correct diagnosis. Even in the advanced western countries,
accurate diagnosis of some autoimmune problems such as Lupus could take well
over a year, and would entail shuttling between various specialist medical
practitioners! For instance, the symptoms for Lupus could
include joint pains, weakness, chest pains, fever, weight loss, skin rash,
swollen nodes and ulcers - all which could be adduced to other causes, rather
than autoimmune dysfunctionality.
Which brings us to the issue of
Informed Consent. The peer reviewed
article by Timothy Cardozo and Ronald Veazey wondered how people could be
expected to give informed consent to receiving the COVID vaccine, when most of
them have never heard of pathogenic priming and ADE to begin with! Furthermore,
only few understand that this first-of-its-kind vaccine for a coronavirus has
been licensed for public use, only in an “experimental capacity” Marshalling
their points to call for a separate Informed Consent Form to explain these
germane issues concerning COVID-19 vaccines to the general public before
administration of vaccines, Cardozo and Veazey wrote:
“COVID-19
vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine
recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines
for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the
development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic
concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach
(consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to
elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA
or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via
antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in
clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials
that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur,
obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.”
It is unfortunate that
rather than step up efforts to inform the general public about the actual risks
associated with COVID-19 vaccines, and promote studies that can help identify
the sub-populations most vulnerable and how the risks may be mitigated, our
public health institutions in Nigeria, are only frantically devising efforts to
convince or coerce the masses to receiving the vaccine, while parroting safety claims
spurned out by the profit-minded foreign vaccine producers and marketers!
Seeing that the facts
of Pathogenic Priming and Antibody-Dependent Enhancement are freely available
in the public domain, however, it would amount to outright CRIMINALITY for
those currently in charge of our public health institutions to ignore these
realities and continue with the planned massive indiscriminate administration
of imported purely EXPERIMENTAL vaccines to people who have not been adequately
informed of the basic and well-established risks involved. Such public officers involved should
understand that they would be called to account for their criminal action, not
only in the hereafter, but even here on earth, before some appropriate Tribunal
in due course.
On a closing note,
Pathogenic Priming and Vaccine-elicited Enhancement of diseases will explain
the projection of some seemingly omniscient forecasters, who have been
predicting the coming of a more deadly variant of COVID for the second quarter
of 2021, by which time hundreds of millions of vaccine doses are expected to
have been administered. Whereas, it has
been globally acknowledged that Nigerians (and Africans in general) have been
much less vulnerable to COVID than the rest of the world, the vaccine could possibly
change this pleasant narrative, rendering our people more vulnerable to the
same virus they had previously successfully resisted. The new development, God forbid it happens, could
then conveniently be interpreted as the arrival of a new more deadly variant,
presumably calling for new vaccines and plunging the continent further into the
bottomless abyss.
All thinking literate
Nigerians are duty-bound to resist these efforts to administer deadly medical
products into the bodies of our unsuspecting fellow compatriots. And for anyone
who after receiving all this information still considers refusing the vaccine too
expensive a proposition (perhaps due to some socio-economic carrots attached),
we would advise them to take time to read this
indepth PremiumTimes report on the presentation of autoimmune diseases in
Nigeria. To get ready for what might be coming their way!